Copyright ©1997-2008 Glenn Fleishman except as noted otherwise. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint, contact Glenn Fleishman at glenn at glennf.com. Photo © 2008 Laurence Chen; used with permission.
Copyright ©1997-2008 Glenn Fleishman except as noted otherwise. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint, contact Glenn Fleishman at glenn at glennf.com. Photo © 2008 Laurence Chen; used with permission.
Turning technology from mumbo-jumbo into rich tasty gumbo
� Laugh Distortion Field | Main | More Emerging Tech Photos �I'm not a particularly interesting person in my own right. I'm very good at collecting stories and facts and turning them into compelling non-fiction stories. This leads people to believe that I might, in fact, be interesting.
At the Emerging Technology conference, I've been watching my own interactions and those of people I meet. I'm relatively well known in this crowd and I have a speaker badge. At the risk of being one of those people who says, "There are two kinds of people: people who categorize people, and those who don't," I'm seeing a lot of emergent Whuffie-based behavior.
(What's Whuffie? It's a catchall term for your relative reputation based on many factors that Cory Doctorow used in his recent novel, and which derives from an even older source he was involved with.)
The more well-known the person you're near, the more likely you are to be deemed interesting. I now know a number of relatively to extremely well-known people. I'm not very opportunistic. I like people who engage on ideas, and many of the folks here who are well known are the kind of folks who talk and are interactive.
Well-known people tend to avoid interacting beyond a superficial level. I've met many people I've wanted to meet for a while, and had great conversations with some of them. Others, even though we've corresponded or I'm on their radar, they had a sort of learned avoidance behavior in crowds that I was either sucked into, or I gave out signals that triggered that behavior. I may be too effusive, complementary, or cognizant of someone's written or spoken works.
The last conversation that ends is the one conducted by someone who has a constitutional inability to stop talking. They always win unless you're rude or Tim O'Reilly. This might offend some people I've talked to, but I've had a number of excellent, long conversations, some of them over an hour, and I'll leave my colleagues guessing which ones of them I'm referring to.
Let me explain my Tim O'Reilly crack: it's not a crack, it's rather a compliment. Tim has a natural, quiet ability to extricate himself from a conversation when that conversation is done. He's not offensive about it; it's very subtle. But it allows him to maximize conversation efficiency. He's well known enough that the degree of deference paid to him combined with this natural ability allows him to leverage this conversational/social advantage.
Man, am I tired.
Posted by Glennf at April 25, 2003 2:40 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/2030
Emergent in this context means behavior that arises as a property of the interaction -- not "new" behavior. Emergent isn't the same as emerging! Sort of my (ironic) point, that was obviously clear to just me.
Posted by: Glenn Fleishman at April 29, 2003 8:19 AM
The only problem with your post is the idea that this is emergent--as someone who networks for a living in entertainment, these precepts have alwayes been around. If anything whuffie will work because it echoes existing social behaviors, not the other way around.
Posted by: Mike D. at April 29, 2003 7:44 AM
Great post, Glenn. Let me turn this around. As you're very well-known yourself - at least compared to myself - what do you recommend for the next time we meet? How do you like to approached, and how do you signal that you don't want to talk anymore...?
One point to ponder: many people with borderline "Geek Syndrome" have difficulty judging such non-verbal signals instinctively, so they have to rely on some sort of mnemonic ("he said 'um' five times consecutively, and rolled his eyes twice, so I'd better run off"). Perhaps we need some sort of more explicit facial protocol... :-)
Posted by: Rainer Brockerhoff at April 26, 2003 10:05 AM
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent Entries
Archives
May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 |