Copyright ©1997-2008 Glenn Fleishman except as noted otherwise. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint, contact Glenn Fleishman at glenn at glennf.com. Photo © 2008 Laurence Chen; used with permission.
Turning technology from mumbo-jumbo into rich tasty gumbo
� Seattle Times Sports Blog Launches | Main | A Quartet's Duo Proposed World of Ends �When I drive by "No War in Iraq" signs, I have some ambivalence about giving them the thumbs up. I don't want to go to war by my nature. I don't want children of any country buried in unmarked graves in lands far from home or sent home in body bags.
But Saddam is one of the most destabilizing forces in the world right now.
So is George Bush.
I've thought if the signs said, "Disarm Bush and Saddam through International Cooperation," I might be honking madly. I can't support the war as it's been laid out, or, in fact, war at all in this case since we're opposed to the dictator not the people.
But I also can't wipe away Saddam's blame along with several other key countries (Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Paraguay, etc.) that are part of the connection of money, people, and opportunity that have led to the state of terrorism in the world.
I didn't elect Bush. We didn't elect Bush. And he's taking Reagan's legacy -- of all things to have to praise the Great Communicator -- and his father's and Clinton's and squandering it. Thank God for Jimmy Carter and his essay today.
Could you ever imagine France, Germany, and Russia standing shoulder to shoulder over avoiding a military action? Three nations that have spilt more blood on each other's territory than possibly any others in history are all agreed.
The moral imperative is to continue to remove Saddam, to push for dismantling the means by which terrorism spreads even among our so-called allies, and to not engage in international war crimes ourselves.
Posted by Glennf at March 9, 2003 8:13 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/1999
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference US Out of North American:
� US Out of North American from The Midnight Blog
Even tech journalists are coming out against Bush's war! It is nice to see so many people start to stand up and be counted. [Read More]
Tracked on March 11, 2003 2:27 AM
I'm curious how Bush is a destabilizing force. Its apparent to me that we are suffering through times created in part to Clinton's ambivalence.
Even Clinton/Gore knew what kind of threat Saddam was and is. Bill Bennett's article on FoxNews.com references their own beliefs on Saddam.
He, Saddam, has been ignoring the UN resolutions for years. He doesn't understand resolution but he does understand military power.
By the way how is it that arguably the worst president in recent memory, Jimmy Carter, is now an expert on foriegn affairs. Carter had a terrible record inside and outside the U.S. Hey, at least he can look forward to building new houses in Iraq.
Remember, other than slavery, fascism, communism and nazism, war never solved anything.
Support the troops and support Glenn's pdf problem. I have owned the book for over a year and it has helped me out on numerous occasions.
bigbiggeek.com
Posted by: Neill at March 21, 2003 1:22 PM
"But Saddam is one of the most destabilizing forces in the world right now.
So is George Bush."
Couldn't agree more. Indeed, I'd go so far as to say that Bush is more destabilizing - he has more power, more money, more supporters and is seemingly even more determined to hasten armageddon.
You're right to point to Carter's piece too. Strongly worded, clearly argued, bang on target. I'm still wondering why he fails to cite his clear source and inspiration for this piece, though. He lays out a good case, but the argument and key points are not exactly original.
I tried digging into this, with some rambling commentary, over here
Greatly enjoying your blog, btw - creeping up my personal 'check daily' list.
/m
Posted by: Michael at March 12, 2003 9:09 PM
Thanks for taking the time to write up your thoughts. I think that it is important to speak up. It helps that we think alike. The threat and if needed the use of military force against Hussine could have been put together in a way that I would have supported, but Bush is a disaster. As Nicolas Kristof wrote:
"So let's take stock of how our invasion of Iraq is going. The Western alliance is ferociously strained, NATO is paralyzed, America is resented by millions, the United Nations is in crisis, U.S. pals like Tony Blair are being skewered at home, North Korea has exploited our distraction to crank up plutonium production, oil prices have surged, and the world financial markets have sagged. And the war hasn't even begun yet."
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/07/opinion/07KRIS.html
Bush is incompetent.
Posted by: Tim at March 10, 2003 10:51 PM
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent Entries
Archives
May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 |