Copyright ©1997-2008 Glenn Fleishman except as noted otherwise. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint, contact Glenn Fleishman at glenn at glennf.com. Photo © 2008 Laurence Chen; used with permission.
Turning technology from mumbo-jumbo into rich tasty gumbo
� US Out of North American | Main | National Do Not Call List �A duo of The Cluetrain Manifesto authorship quadumvirate, Doc Searls and David Weinberger, are back with the latest screed that makes me pump my fist in the air like I just don't care. Or, rather, like I do.
The World of Ends is a set of simple statements which rock the datasphere. When I was at Supernova 2002, where both Doc and David spoke and listened, we heard two messages crashing against each other like the immovable object and irrestible force: quality of service (QoS) in all its many manifestations and the Stupid Network in its clear vision.
The Stupid Network, a term coined by David Isenberg and expanded on by many of his cohorts, states that a network that doesn't know what it's carrying but only strives to connect all points -- what Dave and Doc call, wisely, "ends" -- works best.
The QoS vision says, insidiously, we want certain measures of performance, like video that doesn't skip a beat, and people who pay more for their service being guaranteed packets as they need them. (I went on about this back in December.)
The two notions collide in that the smarter you make the network, the worse you guarantee it will handle anything, and the more control you exercise over its very nature. By abandoning control, which is impossible to perfect anyway, you open the network up to work just as well as it would have if you'd built all that expensive and conflicting QoS stuff.
In practice, it's saying don't try to force higher layer stuff in the network stack, like applications, on lower layer stuff like network or physical elements. If you make everything work the best it can at the lowest levels, including maximizing bandwidth and ensuring diversity of routing and peering, the upper levels can do very well on their own, thank you very much.
Bob Frankston practically hypnotized me into believing this at Supernova 2002, and it's a testament to people that changed the world before that when they start talking in prophet mode, you'd better listen -- in profit mode.
What Doc and Dave are pushing is a clear message aimed at reforming the basis of the contention. What they have done is provide a platform on which future arguments about QoS and the Stupid Network will have to be based. You can no longer argue about these issues without debating whether their syllogism and/or givens are legitimate. You can't ignore them.
Obviously, a book follows, no?
(The World of Ends reminds me in part of a meme I'm pushing through my friends and colleagues in the Wi-Fi hot spot world: the physical part doesn't matter. It's a business of branding and real estate, because everything in between just works. Anybody with some competence can set up a wireless access point, create accounts, track usage, and bill people. There are lots of choices, and it's a routine activity if not trivial. The hard part now in hot spots is creating a brand that people subscribe to -- and by extension make partnerships to firm up the brand -- and to sign real estate venues to put your hot spots in. The middle part can't be ignored but it's not hard. In the World of Ends, the network is a given.)
Posted by Glennf at March 9, 2003 5:13 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/2000
Hi Glenn... have you ever considered a dollar to be a similar simple transport mechanism, this time for the assignment of value? That "price is a signal" notion has gotten heavy play in the economics communities over the years, because it taps into distributed wisdom... centralized intentional manipulations of prices introduce distortions.
Posted by: John Dowdell at March 10, 2003 12:10 PM
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent Entries
Archives
May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 |