Copyright ©1997-2011 Glenn Fleishman except as noted otherwise. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint, contact Glenn Fleishman at glenn at glennf.com. Photo © 2008 Laurence Chen; used with permission.
Turning technology from mumbo-jumbo into rich tasty gumbo
« June 2006 | Main | August 2006 »
I just turned to Lynn and said, “For some reason, I can suddenly read Greek.” She said, “Write that down somewhere,” noting that it’s one of the silliest things I’ve ever said.
I’ve always been able to perform what geeks would call background processes. My brain will chew on stuff without my involvement, and I’ll suddenly wake up with a new intellectual ability. It’s one reason why I can learn language so quickly; there’s some part of my brain that appears to function somewhat autonomously from the rest of my consciousness.
Anyway, I was reading The Professor and the Madman the other day, which is about the creation of the Oxford English Dictionary and an unlikely friendship between two oddly similar men (one in an asylum, a murderer, and the other the head of the OED effort), and I was able to read the Greek phonetically without having to sound out each letter. The Greek was used in the etymology throughout the book. I taught myself how to read Cyrillic when a teenager and learned a very little bit of Russian, and the Cyrllic helped, of course, with the related Greek alphabet.
But, still, it was a surprised after all these decades to look down at Greek and have the sound appear in my head. I’m not sure what broke internally or what finally finished processing in the background. Next, Chinese?
Posted by Glennf at 9:59 PM | TrackBack
Great Daily Show bit with superior dry wit John Hodgman (“I’m a PC”) about net neutrality. Scarily, his description is basically accurate until he veers into outright parody at the end!
Posted by Glennf at 2:09 PM | TrackBack
Posted by Glennf at 5:27 PM | TrackBack
Odd request, but this might percolate out over Technorati: I discovered that Commission Junction’s DNS is misarranged so that the domains they use for affiliate program tracking and redirection are failing. I called Akamai, which handles their DNS, because CJ lacks good contact information on their site. Akamai looked into it and said that there was a change, but it was made by CJ, and thus they can’t modify it. So I’m posting this in the hopes that someone associated with Commission Junction or its Valueclick division will get it and drop me email at glenn@glennf.com so I can explain what’s wrong. I’ll remove this post when things are fixed.
(CJ manages affiliate programs for ecommerce sites with publishers. My isbn.nu site uses CJ for several bookstores. When you see a price result on my site and click, that redirects through a unique combination of CJ domains, to reach the right page on the right destination site. The DNS is set up such as that a domain like www.qksrv.net is a CNAME (canonical name or alias) to cjtrack.valueclick.akadns.net. But cjtrack.valueclick.akadns.net. has no A (address) record associated, which means the redirect fails but good.)
Posted by Glennf at 8:39 PM | TrackBack
Posted by Glennf at 8:01 AM | TrackBack
Someone is trying to con my father, but wise man that he is, it was obvious to him from the start.
My father’s parents died several months apart in 2002 and 2003. They had purchased gravesites where they settled in late retirement in Arizona, but wound up moving to be near my parents in Eugene, where they passed away under close, attentive care. My father figured out how to transfer the gravesites ownership to a Eugene funeral plot, and will eventually sell the plots. (My grandparents didn’t use the sites, ultimately.)
Out of the blue, he’s contacted by someone using terrible English who must be part of a network of fraudsters. They found a listing when my father was trying to sell the Tucson plots. I expect there’s one group of people looking for suckers, another who try to reel them in, and then a set of closers. The person trying to make the deal sent a variety of ridiculous detail, and my father kept in correspondence out of curiosity. Then the closer made an offer; my dad noted that the letter’s diction is totally different. Here’s an excerpt:
“So i’ll be taking the space for ( $4,100).This is okay with me. I intend paying you directly but due to other expenses concerning the burial,I’d be paying through a client of my gran-ma who owes her
$7,600 before her demise.
“However, on the receipt of this cashier’s check/ Money Order, cash it at your bank, deduct yours and wire the balance via money gram/Western Union to the charity home/organization whose address will be forwarded to you later.This is my gran’s opinion concerning the cash owed before her death.You know you have to respect the late.”
This is the classic “forged cashier’s check written for above the selling price and we trust you” scam. craigslist offers a long list of auction scams, many of which are repurposed now to things like funeral plots. They list this one as item #4, “distant person offers to send you a cashier’s check and then have you wire money.” No insult to the great nation of Nigeria, but most of these scammers appear to be operating there as the legal system isn’t doing much with these or similar scammers.
The best known Nigerian scammers operated 419 schemes to transfer $50m to someone they don’t know but trust. I’m reading more and more about people who were really caught up in these schemes and who embezzled or committed crimes in the U.S. to obtain the “transfer fees” necessary to get their hands on the non-existent millions. A woman allegedly shot and killed her husband, a pastor, over family finances after she allegedly kited checks as a result of being a victim of a scam. There was also a story in The New Yorker about a psychotherapist who was pulled so effectively into a 419 scam that he wound up sending them $600,000 of money from forged checks they sent him and spent perhaps $80,000 of his own money. He was found guilty of charges of bank fraud, money laundering, and possession of counterfeit checks.
What’s poetic justice is that someone who is intended to be the victim of this scam who is a scammer themselves, and never ships or delivers the goods and keeps the “extra” money winds up out nothing because when the bank demands the amount of the check back after the forgery is uncovered, they still have the goods and the cash, and may only have to pay a returned check fee (if that, given that it was a forgery that they weren’t involved with).
I’m currently finishing the writing of an ebook about registering and managing domain names, and I wrote part of the book on how to buy a domain name from someone else plus an appendix on selling a domain name. My advice these days with domain names is that you have to be liberal about the forms of payment you accept because once a domain name is transferred, it’s possible but quite annoying to get it back. (As opposed to physical goods and wired money, which are basically just gone.)
My suggestion is that you require a cashier’s check drawn on a major bank and refuse money orders except US Postal Money Orders. USPS checks can’t be for more than $1,000, have many security features, and can be redeemed in cash at any post office. Cashier’s checks aren’t verified more than cursorily by banks, and can be returned. But you can call the issuing bank and confirm major details.
After accepting payment, require a 10-day hold period before making any domain changes. At the end of 10 days, if payment hasn’t been returned for forgery, your agreement should then allow you to retain the registration of the domain name for 30 days, but you agree to point the domain name at wherever the buyers want it. At the end of 30 days, assuming payment held and wasn’t returned, you transfer the domain to their ownership.
I told my dad to call the FBI to get some advice on reporting this. The FBI won’t pursue it, but they might have a suggestion on how to make sure some authorities are aware of this latest scheme.
Posted by Glennf at 10:52 AM | TrackBack
I used to make fun of people who used The Club to protect their car from being stolen—or rather to “deter” thieves—because I knew, like most car thieves know, that the Club doesn’t prevent a determined thief. If it deters, it probably deters to another car on your street. Of course, that was before two things happened. First, most new cars sold into urban and upscale markets have electronic ignitions that are disabled without the appropriate key fob thingee. Second, my car was stolen.
True, it was stolen for just ten feet, but the ignition was destroyed and it cost $1,000 to have it fixed, with 3/4 paid by insurance. My wife and I realized that The Club, in this case, would have prevented the rank amateurs from trying to break into our car. If we were lucky, they might have drooled their meth-addled way by foot over a nearby ravine’s guardrail. (Supposition. The car was so poorly stolen that I assume druggies did it.)
Now an unrelated idea about identity theft: Diaper insertion. Here’s the idea. Child care centers make extra money by having piles of chopped-up credit cards and bills that they place in dirty diapers after changing a kid. The volume would be high enough to handle a lot of identity-laden materials. And I have to ask: Is anyone desperate enough to go through dirty diapers to get a chance at chopped credit cards? Not my best idea, but we might beta test it at home.
Posted by Glennf at 11:12 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
MegaGlennFeed
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 |
Recent Entries
Archives
October 2011 | August 2011 | June 2011 | May 2011 | February 2011 | December 2010 | November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 |